leining the megillah
- Daniel
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 221
- Thank you received: 2
21 Feb 2010 14:24 #1630
by Daniel
leining the megillah was created by Daniel
What is the Minhag in regard to the Ba'al Koreh repeating the words laharog/V'laharog, and Lifneihem/Bifneihem? Should it be done? Should the entire pasuk be repeatet or only the word/phrase. I have been told that Mordechai Breuer (who compiled the Aram Tzova) felt that historically laharog and bifneihem are erroneous.
Daniel
Daniel
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- MPerlman
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 121
- Thank you received: 1
24 Feb 2010 01:04 #1636
by MPerlman
Replied by MPerlman on topic leining the megillah
Since the Aram Tzova has no mesorah in the true sense of the word, being that its text was not followed in its own community (as no Syrian Tanach or Sefer Torah follows the text of the Aram Tzova), I do not think that the Aram Tzova can have any bearing on the discussion.
MPerlman
MPerlman
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Michael
- Offline
24 Feb 2010 03:11 #1637
by Michael
Replied by Michael on topic leining the megillah
Mordechai Breuer claimed that the changes were done by mumorim, but the experts today have proved that these nuscha'os are ancient and were not work of mumorim. Therefore, a kehilloh which has the minhog to go over these words should continue doing so. In addition - even if there is no point in saying Bifneihem, no harm is done by saying it, but if it should been said and is not said - one was not Yotse the Megilloh. A kehilloh that has the minhog to say both options definitely should continue it.
FRBSH
Benno Weis says both Bifneihem and Lifneihem, but says only "Velaharog".
Michael
FRBSH
Benno Weis says both Bifneihem and Lifneihem, but says only "Velaharog".
Michael
Please Log in to join the conversation.